When I worked for Pearson plc in the 1990s, I was part of a newly-created business, Financial Times Management, specialising in management education. When that business was just two years old, a decision was taken no rebrand it as FT Knowledge. There was great enthusiasm for this tie-in with the in-vogue concept of knowledge management, but I felt it was too soon to be changing and the gains from this change were at best transitory and at worst delusional. I dissented and left the company, which went on to fail.
I was reminded of this when I saw a lot of praise for the latest restyling of People Management magazine. Haven't we just had a restyling? Are the benefits of the latest change a worthwhile use of CIPD member subscriptions? I think I'm facing the wrong way (or is it the wrong way?) on this one too.
It's a fairly minor thing, so I haven't said anything - until now. I suspect others feel the same, but who wants to be the solitary guardsman facing the wrong way?
In the financial markets, this can be a valuable attribute. Warren Buffet is the classic example,and we have many in Britain too - perhaps I should move into contrarian investment management.
- ► 2013 (16)
- ▼ 2012 (46)
- ► 2011 (25)
- ► 2010 (18)
- ► 2009 (33)
- ► 2008 (25)